Monday, April 22, 2024

The latest news from the world of project management

How to fail well...

Failure Is the new success. Here are five ways that you can embrace...

5 Skills Needed To...

Why do projects fail? It's a question that invites a lot of interest and...

Embrace the change: Getting...

New IT systems for a growing business can be an exciting prospect and...

Does a Project Manager...

What makes a successful project manager is a combination of their academic abilities,...
HomeGeneralThe human side...

The human side of risk management

or ‘The answer to risk management that isn’t working is not more risk management’

I was invited into the office of a Director of a large, regulated infrastructure business. In the UK, companies regulated in this way are obliged to invest in the country’s infrastructure. The target amount of investment is agreed with the regulator and the company suffers penalties if it fails to meet that target. This particular Director was responsible for £500 million of capital works projects over the course of a year.

The purpose of the meeting was nominally to discuss the fact that he wanted us to conduct some Monte Carlo analysis training for his project managers. Naturally, I asked why he specifically wanted training in Monte Carlo analysis so he explained his problem:

All his project managers had been trained in basic risk analysis. Every project ran risk workshops and entered the results in their risk registers. Suitable responses were planned and risk budgets calculated – which then became part of the budget in the approved business case.

But of course, not all risks actually occur, so not all the money in the risk budget is needed. But of course, a project manager is reluctant to release money from their budget because they may need it for a rainy day.

From the overall regulated budget point of view, if money that was originally in the risk budget gets used to cover increased costs elsewhere, that’s not a problem because the money has been spent on improving infrastructure.

The problem in this case was where the money sat in the risk budgets of several projects and never got spent.

An audit in the October of this particular year had shown several millions of pounds sitting in risk budgets that were unlikely to get spent. By that time it was too late to get any new schemes underway with the cash that had been released.

The Director faced the prospect of having to explain to the regulator why the investment target had not been met.

His initial reaction was ‘our risk management isn’t good enough, we need more sophisticated techniques’.

After a lengthy conversation, we agreed that Monte Carlo training probably wouldn’t make much difference. What we ended up doing was running workshops that aimed to change behaviour and concentrated how risk management should be applied in the context of a regulated budget.

Successful application of any technique is 20% about the technique and 80% about the behaviour that applies it.

 

 

Related Posts

Continue reading

Praxis launches free capability maturity tool

Capability maturity assessments are often done once or twice a year to check on how an organisation is performing and hopefully to improve project and programmes delivery . But between assessments, organisations can suffer a loss of focus on the things that need...

New comparative glossary from Praxis

Praxis, the free on-line framework for managing projects, programmes and portfolios, has now launched its comparative glossary of P3 Management terms. The first edition compares and explains terminology from PRINCE2TM, the PMBoK® guide, ISO21500, the APM Body of Knowledge...

Praxis Framework published by APM

As the need for rounded project management professionals becomes even greater, a new publication aims to guide individuals and organisations through the confusing landscape on the journey to becoming a true professional. With Praxis Framework: An integrated guide to the...